From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Hospital Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Medicare Bounce-Back Hospital Admissions

Rehospitalization rates among Medicare beneficiaries are unacceptably high.

In February 2009, we reviewed a report on a standardized discharge intervention that lowered the incidence of rehospitalization (JW Hosp Med Feb 2 2009). Now, another study clearly demonstrates the extent of the bounce-back admissions problem.

An analysis of 15 months (2003–2004) of Medicare beneficiary data revealed that 20% of older hospitalized patients were readmitted within 30 days, 34% returned within 90 days, 45% returned within 180 days, and 56% returned within 1 year. Researchers found no charges for outpatient physician visits for half the patients who were rehospitalized within 30 days (after medical discharge to the community).

Diseases associated with the highest 30-day rehospitalization rates were congestive heart failure (27%), psychoses (25%), vascular surgery (24%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (23%). Although patients with chronic conditions tended to have higher rates of readmission, patients with acute conditions also often were readmitted within 30 days (e.g., 20% of pneumonia patients).

Comment: In this study, the cost of unplanned rehospitalizations in 2004 was estimated to account for US$17.4 billion of the $102.6 billion in hospital payments from Medicare. A large percentage of bounce-back admissions appear to be related directly to poorly coordinated transitions of care. Given that a woeful percentage of patients attend follow-up visits, tremendous improvement might be possible if patients were seen by their primary care physicians within a few weeks after discharge. The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPac) has recommended that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) inform hospitals of their risk-adjusted readmission rates and provide lower payments for hospitals that have high rates of readmissions for certain conditions. Whatever policy is implemented, I agree with the editorialist’s view that hospitals and primary care providers need shared incentives and accountability for solving this problem.

Neil H. Winawer, MD, FHM

Published in Journal Watch Hospital Medicine April 1, 2009

Citation(s):

Jencks SF et al. Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med 2009 Apr 2; 360:1418.

Epstein AM. Revisiting readmissions — Changing the incentives for shared accountability. N Engl J Med 2009 Apr 2; 360:1457.

Reader Remarks:

Read all Reader Remarks on this article

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2009. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.