From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Hospital Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Consensus on Care Transitions: Time for All of Us to Step Up to the Plate

Major professional organizations put forth recommendations on managing patient transitions between inpatient and outpatient settings.

Previous research on care transitions between inpatient and outpatient settings has revealed a high rate of medication discrepancies, lack of adequate and timely communication between caregivers during transitions, and minimal involvement of patients and families in the transition process. To address these issues, the Transitions of Care Consensus Conference convened a multidisciplinary group that represented more than 30 major medical professional organizations, including general internists, hospitalists, geriatricians, and emergency medicine physicians, and government agencies. This group was charged with identifying a core set of principles for effective care transitions and defining a set of standards to achieve the basic tenets of those principles (Table).

Comment: Safe and seamless transitions are imperative for ensuring quality healthcare. This consensus statement from stakeholder organizations paves the way for establishing minimum standards and best practices in transition processes. Hospitals, other healthcare organizations, and clinicians must inculcate a culture of multidisciplinary collaboration by developing and supporting standards of documentation and communication — with a focus on measuring and improving outcomes — for the care-transition period.

Daniel D. Dressler, MD, MSc, FHM

Published in Journal Watch Hospital Medicine October 9, 2009

Citation(s):

Snow V et al. Transitions of Care Consensus policy statement: American College of Physicians, Society of General Internal Medicine, Society of Hospital Medicine, American Geriatrics Society, American College of Emergency Physicians, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. J Hosp Med 2009 Jul/Aug; 4:364. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jhm.510)

Reader Remarks:

Review and add to remarks on this article

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2009. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.