From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Hospital Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Technology and Its Unintended Consequences

Newer electronic devices can induce potentially hazardous incidents in critical care medical equipment.

Radio frequency identification (RFID) systems such as security access cards and electronic toll units on car windshields have become increasingly common in everyday life. Now, they also are being used in medicine to do all sorts of things, such as tracking surgical sponges, preventing drug counterfeiting, and monitoring blood products. But, as with any new technology that develops rapidly, unintended consequences are bound to happen. RFID systems potentially can induce electromagnetic interference that affects the performance of electrical equipment. This is problematic in intensive care units, where many electronic medical devices are present, and patients are less likely to tolerate adverse consequences of electrical glitches.

In simulations that did not involve patients, investigators studied the effects of two different types of RFID systems on 41 medical devices that are used commonly in critical care settings (e.g., infusion pumps, mechanical ventilators, external pacemakers). During 123 tests, the investigators documented 34 incidents of interference. Each incident was rated as hazardous (e.g., total stop of a syringe pump), significant (e.g., abnormal monitoring of blood pressure), or light (e.g., monitor disturbance that didn’t require attention). Of the 34 incidents, 22 were hazardous, 2 were significant, and 10 were light. The median distance between RFID readers and medical devices in all interference incidents was 30 cm (about 1 foot).

Comment: In a controlled nonclinical setting, RFID systems induced potentially hazardous incidents in medical devices. Although the researchers tested devices from only two manufacturers, we can infer that they are similar to the devices that are currently in clinical use. Although RFID systems will be important for the future of healthcare, an editorialist rightfully points out that a coordinated effort on the part of hospitals, regulators, and manufacturers is necessary immediately to ensure the safety of patients as this new technology develops.

Neil Winawer, MD

Published in Journal Watch Hospital Medicine July 7, 2008

Citation(s):

van der Togt R et al. Electromagnetic interference from radio frequency identification inducing potentially hazardous incidents in critical care medical equipment. JAMA 2008 Jun 25; 299:2884.

Berwick DM. Taming the technology beast. JAMA 2008 Jun 25; 299:2898.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2008. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.