From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Hospital Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Analysis of Care Provided by Hospitalists

Hospital stays were shortened when care was provided by hospitalists.

Hospital medicine is the fastest-growing specialty in the U.S., with more than 20,000 hospitalists practicing in 2007. Earlier studies on the value of hospitalists were small and from single institutions; in a new retrospective cohort study, investigators evaluated patient outcomes generated by a large number of hospitalists, general internists, and family physicians in a variety of practice settings.

The study included 76,926 adult patients who were discharged with principal diagnoses of pneumonia, heart failure, chest pain, acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, urinary tract infection, or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from 45 U.S. hospitals. Compared with patients of general internists, patients of hospitalists had significantly shorter hospital stays (5.2 vs. 4.7 days) and significantly lower costs (by US$268). Inpatient death rates and 14-day admission rates were similar in the two groups. Compared with family physicians’ patients, hospitalists’ patients had significantly shorter lengths of stay (5.2 vs. 4.8 days), but costs, death rates, and 14-day readmission rates were similar in the two groups.

Comment: In this large study, the hospitalist model was associated with a shorter length of stay, without having adverse effect on rates of readmission or death. Hospitalist care also was slightly less expensive than care provided by general internists. This study’s results validate the hospitalist model, and I agree with the editorialist: The field of hospital medicine is here to stay, so we need to move past studies of costs and outcomes and focus on relevant patient care and systems questions, such as comparative effectiveness, patient safety, and quality improvement.

Neil H. Winawer, MD

Published in Journal Watch Hospital Medicine December 19, 2007

Citation(s):

Lindenauer PK et al. Outcomes of care by hospitalists, general internists, and family physicians. N Engl J Med 2007 Dec 20; 357:2589.

McMahon LF Jr. The hospitalist movement — Time to move on. N Engl J Med 2007 Dec 20; 357:2627.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2007. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.